K.Gopinathan v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/31ST BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30890 of 2014 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- K.GOPINATHAN, PUNNEKKATTU HOUSE, THANNEERMUKKOM.P.O., CHERTHALA.

BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE.P.O., ALAPPUZHA. PIN-688 001

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA.P.O., PIN-688 001

3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHERTHALA.P.O., PIN-688 524 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 30890 of 2014 (I) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1.

ATRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 15-8-83. P2.

A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15-10-85.

P3.

A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 7-11-85. P4.

A TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 30-10-85.

P5.

A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 13-1-86.

P6.

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 21-1-86. P7.

A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 22-1-93. P8.

A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 30-7-2013.

P9.

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 01-11-2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 30890 of 2014 ================== Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner approached the third respondent for assignment of the Kayal Puramboke. It appears that on account of interdiction issued by this Court in O.P No.17233/1996. 2.

This Court in fact distinguished the above judgment in W.P.C 23709/14.

3.

This court is of the view that application for the assignment of the Kayal Puramboke shall be considered after adverting to the decision of this Court in W.P.C 23709/14. Needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE