High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30683/2015disposed of

K.V.Babu v. Secretary

2015-10-13Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/21ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30683 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- K.V.BABU S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR KIZHAKKEVEETTIL KARINGAD P.O., KAVILUMPARA, KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA - 673 101 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30683 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER P2 :

COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-18 7059 P3 :

COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 03.10.2015 P4 :

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C). NO 16186/2015 DATED 5.6.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 30683 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P3 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify the period within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit. The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE