High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30787/2015closed

Shahul Hameed v. Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-10-14Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/22ND ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30787 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS :

-----------------

1. SHAHUL HAMEED, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED ABDUL KADHER, PAARAVILA VEEDU, 2.PULLOORKONAM, VIZHINJAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM, PIN : 695 521.

2. ASHARA BEEVI,, W/O.MUHAMMED ABDUL KADHER, PAARAVILA VEEDU, 2.PULLOORKONAM, VIZHINJAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM, PIN : 695 521.

BY ADV. SRI.KISHOR B.

RESPONDENTS :

-------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIZHINJAM POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM DIST. PIN : 695 525.

2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT P.O., TRIVANDRUM, PIN : 695 001.

3. SIDHIKHU, J.J. MANZIL, THOTTUVARAMPU, MOONNUKALLIN MOODU, NEYYATTINKARA, TRIVANDRUM DIST. PIN : 695 121. R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.C.R. SYAM KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30787 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.C. No.2091/2008 DATED 28.11.2008 OF SESSIONS, COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :

NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J. & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 30787 OF 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, C.J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader.

2. This writ petition has been filed alleging police harassment. Petitioners submit that the 3rd respondent is the brother of 2nd petitioner and at the instance of 3rd respondent, police is unduly harassing the petitioners.

3. Learned Government Pleader after obtaining instructions submits that neither any complaint has been received from any of the parties nor police authorities have called the petitioner at any time. It is submitted that only after receiving notice of the writ petition, police authorities went to the residence where they were residing, but they were not found there and the daughters of the petitioners are living there. The daughters, according to the police, has stated that they are willing to accommodate the petitioners.

WP(C) No. 30787 of 2015 -:2:- We do not find any police harassment in this case. The Writ Petition is closed.

Ashok Bhushan, Chief Justice.

A.M. Shaffique, Judge.

ttb/14/10