← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30887/2015disposed of

Abdul Rahiman v. President, Poyyathabyle Jama-Ath

2015-10-12Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30887 of 2015 (I) PETITIONER(S) :

--------------------------

1. ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.ABOOBACKER, NEROLIKA, P.O.KOLLAMKODE, KASARAGODE.

2. ABDULLA FAIZY, AGED 46 YEARS, DHARMANAGAR, P.O.KOLLAMKODE, KASARAGODE.

BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. PRESIDENT, POYYATHABYLE JAMA-ATH, (POYYATHBLE JAMA-ATH AND MANAVATTI BEEVI DHARGA SHERIEF COMMITTEE), KOLLAMKODE P.O., KASARAGODE DISTRICT- 671 121.

2. P.K.IBRAHIM, SECRETARY, POYYATHABLE JAMA-ATH, (POYYATHBLE JAMA-ATH AND MANAVATTI BEEVI DHARGA SHERIEF COMMITTEE), KOLLAMKODE P.O., KASARAGODE DISTRICT- 671 121.

3. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, V.I.P.ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017.

R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA, S.C, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 30887 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION O.P.(W) NO.193/2014 DATED 12.11.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.11.2014 PASSED BY THE WAKF BOARD.

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20.04.2015 IN O.P.NO.193/2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION O.P.NO.195/2014 DATED 25.11.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 25.11.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

W.P(C).No. 30887 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th October,2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court on account of the delay in disposing of Exhibits P3 and P5 applications.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that appropriate decision shall be taken by the third respondent on Exhibits P3 and P5 as early as possible either in the next sitting or in the sitting thereafter.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE vgs12/10/15