High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30897/2015disposed of

K.K.Jyothi v. The State Of Kerala

2015-10-12Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30897 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K.K.JYOTHI, AGED 41 YEARS WIFE OF K.P. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SOCIAL SCIENCE) PERAMBRA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PERAMBRA KOZHIKODE DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001

2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001

3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION KOZHIKODE - 673020

4. THE MANAGER PERAMBRA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PERAMBRA KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673525

5. SMT. SUSMITHA PERAMBRA HIGHER SECONDARY SHCOOL, PERAMBRA KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673525 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30897 of 2015 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT. P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE MA (ENGLISH) CERTIFICATE EXT. P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE B.ED (HINDI AND SOCIAL SCIENC) CERTIFICATE EXT. P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 01.09.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / PA TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.30897 of 2015 - J ====================== Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P3 appeal filed before the 3rd respondent. The representation is filed on 01.09.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 3rd respondent definitely will have to look at the appeal filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 3rd respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/12 /10 /2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.