Sreedharan v. The Secretay, Rta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31007 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ SREEDHARAN M., S/O. P. KRISHNAN, KRISHNA KRIPA, 543/4 PALLIKKARA, P.O. PANAYAL, VIA BEKAL.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT:

--------------------- THE SECRETAY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARGOD 671 121.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 31007/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.03.2015 IN WP(C) 7852/2015 EXHIBIT P2 :

COPY OF THE CHALLAN IN PROOF OF PAYMENT OF RS.5000/- EXHIBIT P3 :

COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 31.03.2015.

EXHIBIT P4 :

COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 22.08.2015.

EXHIBIT P5 :

COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 22.09.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.02.2014 IN WP(C) NO. 4711/2014.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 31007 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The issue is covered by Ext.P6 judgment which follows Rajan Vs. Regional Transport Authority [2014 (1) 387]. Ext.P5 order directing endorsement of the lease agreement is therefore not warranted and hence quashed.

2.

The respondent is directed to reconsider the application for replacement put in by the petitioner. The same shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd