Sampath Elcy Thomas v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/21ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31055 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ SAMPATH ELCY THOMAS AGED 33 YEARS W/O. SANTHOSH C.Y. UPSA, C.M.S.H.S.S PUNNAVELI, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR SRI.K.SANDESH RAJA ADV.SRI.VENU MENON RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, D.P.I. JUNCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 3.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645 4.

DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, THIRUVALLA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645.

5.

THE COPORATE MANAGER, C.M.S. SCHOOL, DIOCESE OF MADHYA KERALA, DIOCESAN OFFICE , BISHOP GILL MEMORIAL BUILDING, CATHEDRAL ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31055 of 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER REJECTING THE APPROVAL OF THE PETITIONER NO.B6-4247/11 DATED 25.11.2011 P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B3/14950/2011/K.DIS. DATED 10.02.2012 P3 :

TRUE OCPY OF THE ORDER NO.ET3/82377/13/DPI/K.DIS DATED 01.08.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION NO.872/13 DATED 27.09.2013 P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER BINDU S. DAS APPROVED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 1.6.2010 P6 :

COPY OF THE LETTER NO.21514/H2/12/GE.EDN. DATED 8.5.2012 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 31055 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P4 revision dated 27.09.2013 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Manager and petitioner, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 13/10/15