High Court of KeralaWP(C)/38225/2007dismissed

Kiran v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,Kottaym

2015-03-23Honourable Mr.Justice K.Surendra Mohan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/2ND CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38225 of 2007 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

-------------------------- KIRAN, PARAYIL HOUSE, VEDIMUGHAL, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.B.PREMOD SRI.T.R.SATHYAN RESPONDENTS :

----------------------------

1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM KOTTAYAM.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.

3. V.A.KURIAN, VALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VILLOONNI P.O., ARPPOOKKARA. R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 38225 of 2007 (A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE SALE CONFIRMATION REPORT AND THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 20.11.2006 EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 25.4.2007 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 2.5.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14.5.2007 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 23.5.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.5.2007 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :

EXT.R1(a) : COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM DATED 23.5.2007 EXT.R1(b) : COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DATED 28.12.2007 /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE AV

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.38225 of 2007 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

This is a writ petition of the year 2007. Service is not complete on the 3rd respondent. Notice was not issued to the 3rd respondent for the reason that, no process was paid by the petitioner. When this case is taken up today, there is no representation.

This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.

Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.