High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31083/2015disposed of

Philip C John v. Secretary, Rta, Kottayam

2015-10-16Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31083 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- PHILIP C JOHN., AGED 52 YEARS CHIRAKKAL HOUSE, LAKKATTOOR PO, KOTTAYAM.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):

------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM-686 002. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31083 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-35 1008 P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DT 9-10-2015.

P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO.26955/2015 DT 11-9-2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.31083 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P3 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify a period not exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/16.10.2015