Soumya Rajan v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/28TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31151 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- SOUMYA RAJAN, AGED 32 YEARS W/O.K.N. RATHEESH LAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (COMPUTER SCIENCE) DESABHANDU HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THACHAMPARA PALAKKAD- 678 593.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, DOWN HILL MALAPPURAM - 676 519.

4. THE MANAGER, DESABANDHU HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THACHAMPARA PALAKKAD - 678 593.

5. THE PRINCIPAL, DESABANDHU HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THACHAMPARA PALAKKAD - 678 593.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.P. PADMALAYAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31151 of 2015 (T) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT) 128/10/G.EDN. DATED 20/07/2010 ALONG WITH THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE LIST.

EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(MS) 211/2013/G.EDN. DATED 15/07/2013. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(MS) 26/2014/G.EDN. DATED 01/02/2014 EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE DATED 21/08/2011.

EXHIBIT-P5- TRUE COPY OF THE APPIONTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 22/09/2011.

EXHIBIT-P6- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. F/11711/2014/RDD/HSE/MLPM DATED 14/01/2015 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.31151 of 2015 - T ====================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P5 appointment order filed before the 3rd respondent.

2. In such circumstance, the 3rd respondent definitely will have to look at the order filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 3rd respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/ 20 /10 /2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.