← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/34187/2011dismissed for default

Eliyamma v. State Of Kerala

2015-01-07Honourable Mr.Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/17TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 34187 of 2011 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS:

--------------------------

1. ELIYAMMA, W/O.ULAHANNAN, AGED 71 YEARS, PATTAKKUNNEL HOUSE, KUMBLERI.P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

2. JOSEPH.C.M, S/O. MATHAI, AGED 36 YEARS, CHERADIYIL HOUSE, KUMBLERI.P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

3. K.T. POULOSE, AGED 61 YEARSM KOTTEKUDI HOUSE, KUMBLERI.P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

4. CHACKO.K.P, AGED 63 YEARS, EDAPPATT HOUSE, KUMBLERI POST, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.DAISY A.PHILIPOSE RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD-673 001.

3. THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTTRICT OFFICE, WAYANAD-673 001.

4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, WAYANAD-673 001.

5. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, JASAM COMPLEX, PINANGODE ROAD KALPETTA, WAYANAD - 673 121.

WP(C).No. 34187 of 2011 (W)

6. AMBALAVAYAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

7. K.P. MOHANAN, KODIKULATH HOUSE, KUMBLERI.P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673 001.

R1-R4 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES R5 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS, SC, POLLN. CONTROL BOARD SRI.M.AJAY, SC, POLLN. CONTROL BOARD R6 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI R7 BY ADVS. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.P.C.GOPINATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VPV

C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.

--------------------------- W.P.(C)No.34187 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

There was no representation for the petitioners when the case was called up on yesterday. Hence the case was adjourned to today, included in the disposal list. Today also there is no representation for the petitioners when the case was called up.

Under the above mentioned circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE MJL