High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31242/2015disposed of

P.Rajeshkumar v. Travancore Devaswom Board

2015-10-21Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/29TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31242 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ P.RAJESHKUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS S/O.V. P. NAMPOOTHIRI, 'SANTHI'

KARIMBALOOR-PANANGAD SREE MAHAVISHNU TEMPLE PATHANAPURAM KAVALA SUB GROUP, PUNALUR GROUP TRAVANCORE DEVASOM BOARD RESIDING AT 'SREEMANGALATH MADOM'

ASHTA MANGALAM, MANIYAR P.O.

PUNALUR - 691 333.

BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.

2. DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.

BY SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31242 of 2015 (E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- EXT. P1 :

COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 28/06/2005.

EXT. P2 :

COPY OF THE ORDER ROC NO.10244/09/S. DATED 08/01/2010 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXT. P3 :

COPY OF THE ORDER NO.122 DATED 23/01/2010 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT. P4 :

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 26/03/2015.

EXT. P5 :

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11/09/2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL ------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.31242 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of October, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner's contention in the writ petition is with respect to the delay in conclusion of the enquiry proceedings. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents appears and under instructions submits that the disciplinary proceedings will be concluded at any rate within three months from today. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

Sp/21/10/15