Raveendran v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Cum Regional Transport Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/22ND ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31274 of 2015 (H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
-------------------------- RAVEENDRAN S/O. MADHAVAN NIKARTHIL HOUSE VAYALAR P.O.
CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT:
---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ALAPPUZHA - 688 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 31274 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT ALONG WITH AND PROPOSED TIMING DATED 8.9.2015 ON THE ROUTE ARTHINKAL - AROOR TEMPLE, WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 16/D 2345 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 31274 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.
2.
I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 3.
Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS