High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31312/2015disposed of

Indu Shekhar R v. Kerala University Of Health And Sciences

2015-10-14Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/22ND ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31312 of 2015 (L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- INDU SHEKHAR R., AGED 23 YEARS PANNIPUZHAYIL HOUSE EDYARANMULA WEST P.O.

KOZHENCHERRY TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 532 NOW RESIDING AT NO.2, JUDGES AVENUE KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017 BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SIVAJI RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND SCIENCES REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULANKUNNTHUKAVU, THRISSUR 2.

THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES MULANKUNNTHUKAVU, THRISSUR 3.

THE BOARD OF ADJUDICATION OF STUDENTS' GREIVANCES REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES MULANKUNNTHUKAVU, THRISSUR BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31312 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE MARK LIST DOWNLOADED FROM THE WEBSITE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT P2 :

COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT P3 :

COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE REGULATION FOR THE MBBS COURSE RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 31312 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner contends that the internal assessment marks shall not be reckoned for the purpose of deciding the pass criteria. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision in Maharashtra University of Health Sciences v. Paryani Mukesh Jawaharlal and Others [(2007) 10 SCC 201]. Ext. P2 complaint put in by the petitioner in this regard is pending consideration. 2.

I direct the third respondent to consider Ext. P2 complaint in the light of the dictum in Maharashtra University of Health Sciences v. Paryani Mukesh Jawaharlal and Others [(2007) 10 SCC 201]. The term aggregate appearing in para 23 of the judgment aforequoted means the total marks in each paper. Final orders on Ext. P2 complaint shall be passed as early as possible.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS