Wilson Thomas v. Special Tahsildar (Lr)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/22ND ASWINA, 1937 W.P.(C).No. 31326 of 2015 (M) PETITIONERS:

1. WILSON THOMAS, MELITTU HOUSE, PADUKADU DESOM, VIYYUR P.O.

KILLANNUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR-680 010.

2. SINDHU MARIYA GEO, W/O.GEO PAUL OOKEN, XX/17, CHAKKALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, EDAKKULAM DESOM, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

3. GEO PAUL OOKEN, S/O.PAUL, XX/17, CHAKKALAPARAMBIL HOUSE EDAKKULAM DESOM, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU CHERUKARA SRI.P.A.SALIM RESPONDENTS:

1. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR) LAND TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR-680 001.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. PIN-695 001.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31326 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

P1- TRUE COPY OF THE SALE CERTIFICATE IN D R C NO.1226 IN O.AK105/1999 DATED 25.8.2010 ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN DATED 15.10.2012.

P3- TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.1664/2013 DATED 1.6.2013 OF VADAKKUMKARA SUB REGISTRY.

P4- TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.2084 OF 2014 OF VADAKKUMKARA SUB REGISTRY DATED 25.8.2014.

P5- TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 15.9.2015 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

P6- TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ISSUED FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT'S OFFICE FOR THE RECEIPT OF THE EXT.P5 APPLICATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE PtK/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 31326 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 14th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners aggrieved by non consideration of application for transfer of registry has approached this Court. 2.

The petitioners claim Jenmam right based on the documents Exts. P1, P3 and P4.

3.

This Court is of the view that appropriate decision shall be taken by the first respondent on application after hearing the petitioner and affected persons if any within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE