← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31515/2015disposed of

Susmita N.S. v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-15Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/23RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31515 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- 1.

SUSMITA N.S., D/O.LATE SUKUMARAN, W/O.SANIL E.B., NOCHIKKATT HOUSE, POYYA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DT., NOW RESIDING AT ERAMPURACKAL HOUSE, KATHIYALAM, P.O.KARA, KODUGNALLUR.

2.

SIBIN.N.S., S/O.LATE SUKUMARAN, NOCHIKKATT HOUSE, POYYA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, NOW AT C/O.ANIRUDHAN N.A., NOCHIKKATT HOUSE, KODUNGALLUR, N.PARAVUR.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------ 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2.

THE TAHSILDAR, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, MINI CIVIL STATION, KODUNGALLUR, PIN-680664.

3.

THE VILLAGE OFFICER, POYYA VILLAGE, P.O.POYYA, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-68033.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

WP(C).No. 31515 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NOS.591/14 DT.6/3/14 P2 :

COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NOS.592/14 DT.6/3/14 P3 :

COPIES OF THE RECEIPTS SHOWING REMITTANCE OF FEE ISSUED BY THE R3 DT.1/7/14.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P(C).No. 31515 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached respondents 2 and 3 for effecting mutation of the property covered by Exhibits P1 and P2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the delay in considering the above applications.

In the above facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the second respondent, Tahsildar to take a decision on the applications filed by the petitioners within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioners.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE vgs15/10/15