P. Chandrasekharan v. Kerala State Financial Enterprises

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31537 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ P. CHANDRASEKHARAN AGED 53 YEARS, BRANCH MANAGER, KILIMANOOR BRANCH, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT PARVATHINANDANAM CHOOTTAYIL, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL SRI.R.B.RAJESH RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE, 'BHADRATHA', THRISSUR - 680 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

2.

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR (IN CHARGE), THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE, 'BHADRATHA', THRISSUR, 680 020 3.

THE CHARIMAN, THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE, 'BHADRATHA', THRISSUR, 680 020 4.

SRI. KESAVAN NAMPOOTHIRI N.

INSPECTING OFFICER, INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT, THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, KOLLAM - 691 001.

BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31537 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSFER ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.8.2015 P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSFER NORMS ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29.3.2012 P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DAED 17.08.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 31537 of 2015 (N) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the transfer made at Ext.P1. The petitioner, as per the transfer norms, has filed Ext.P3 representation before the Managing Director. 2.

The learned Standing Counsel for the Managing Director had sought for time to get instructions. But, however, in the nature of the orders passed, this Court is of the opinion that no instruction need be obtained. 3.

The Managing Director shall consider the representation within a period of two weeks from the date of this judgment. It is made clear that the transfer of the petitioner is not in any manner interdicted nor has this Court gone into the merits of the matter, which has to be decided by the Managing Director.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge jjj 16/10/15