Ramachandran P.V v. Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31636 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ RAMACHANDRAN P.V AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. VASUDEVAN KARTHA, WORKING AS OVERSEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., KARUKACHAL, RESIDING AT PALLATTU HOUSE, MANARCAD P.O., KOTTAYAM BY ADV. SRI.T.T.RAKESH RESPONDENTS:

----------------------- 1.

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31636 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF BOARD ORDER NO.AR/III. 36591/78 DATED 23.1.1981 P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER NO.1631/2007 DATED 13.7.2007 P3 :

TRUE COPY OF BOARD ORDER NO.2020/2010 DATED 2.8.2010 P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 30.7.2014 IN W.A. NO.1094/2014 P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 17.8.2015 P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 10.9.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 31636 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P6 representation dated 10.09.2015 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge jjj 16/10/15