Ajith V G v. A E O Coyalmannam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/27TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31760 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- AJITH V G AGED 29 YEARS LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, AIDED LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, COYALMANNA, KARINGODE, (VIA) COYALMANNAM, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS:

------------------------- 1.

ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, COYALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 702 2.

DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 001.

3.

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014.

4.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS:

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 5.

THE MANAGER, AIDED LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, COYALMANNA, KARINGODE, (VIA) COYALMANNAM, PALAKKAD 678 702 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31760 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26.11.2013 P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY D.E.O. DATED 16.6.2014 P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER DATED 15.7.2014 P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DATED 7.7.2014 FILED BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.9.2014 BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE D.P.I. DATED 23.2.2015 P7 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE A.E.O. BEFORE THE D.P.I. DATED 9.4.2015 P8 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER SENT TO THE D.P.I. DATED 31.7.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 31760 of 2015 (T) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Exts.P4 & P5 revisions dated 07.07.2014 and 29.9.2014 respectively have not been considered till date by the 3rd respondent. 2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the revisions, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 3rd respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 20/10/15