Seena v. The Sub Inspector Of Police, Nedumangad
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/1ST POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31836 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :- -------------- SEENA, W/O.SHIHABUDEEN, M.S.MANZIL, ATTINPURAM, PANAVOOR P.O., NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.SIJU KAMALASANAN SMT.S.SEETHA RESPONDENTS :- ----------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 541.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 541.
3. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.
4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NANDAVANAM, PALAYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.
5. MAHEEN, S/O.JIRAR, KOCHANAYIKONAM, PANAVOOR, NEDUMANGAD - 695 568.
6. PANAVOOR NAZAR, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, KUNNUMPURATHU VEEDU, PANAVOOR P.O., NEDUMANGAD - 695 568.
7. SHAFI, S/O.BASHEER, M.M.HOUSE, PANAVOOR P.O., NEDUMANGAD - 695 568.
8. NISHAD, S/O.BASHEER, M.M.HOUSE, PANAVOOR P.O., NEDUMANGAD - 695 568.
R1 TO R4 BY SMT.SHEEBA M.T., GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 31836 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- --------------------------- EXHIBIT P-1 : THE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 12.10.2015.
EXHIBIT P-2 : THE COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT.
EXHIBIT P-3 : THE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 12.10.2015 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL --------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
P.UBAID, J.
============================ W.P.(C)No.31836 of 2015 ============================ Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2015
JUDGMENT
The writ petitioner herein seeks a writ of mandamus, or other direction for action on her Ext.P1 complaint. Now there is a report from the Sub Inspector of Police, Nedumangadu that the police has already registered a crime on Ext.P1 complaint under Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act, and that investigation is in progress. The petitioner's grievance stands redressed. What she wants is registration of a crime on her complaint, and investigation. That is now being done by the police, as reported. In such a situation, this writ petition need not proceed.
Accordingly, this writ petition is closed, recording the report of the police. However, the police is directed to expedite investigation, and submit final report at the earliest. The police will also look into the grievance of the writ petitioner as regards the objectionable clippings. Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE