High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31933/2015disposed of

Sameer v. The Additional District Magistrate

2015-10-29Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/7TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31933 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- SAMEER, S/O.ABOOBACKER,AGED 35 YEARS, MUTHUKODAN HOUSE, AMBALAKADAVU P.O., KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM - 676 505.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUVARAKUNDU POLICE STATION, KARUVARAKUNDU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 523.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM - 676 505.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 31933 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE DATED 04.08.2012 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.550/2014 OF KARUVARAKUNDU POLICE STATION.

P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL DATED 06.03.2015 P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 09.03.2015 P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.07.2015 IN WPC NO.22043/2015 P6 - TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED NIL.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.31933 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 29th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner applied for renewal of Explosive Licence. This has been rejected on the ground of pendency of the criminal case. The petitioner submits that he has not been convicted. In that view of the matter, the petitioner's application for renewal shall be considered notwithstanding the pendency of the crime against the petitioner. In view of the above, respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue necessary No Objection Certificate to the petitioner to process the application for renewal. Needful shall be done by respondents 2 and 3 within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln