High Court of KeralaWP(C)/31934/2015disposed of

Sr.Karuniya Sic v. The State Of Kerala

2015-10-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/28TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31934 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SR.KARUNIYA SIC, AGED 59 YEARS DAUGHTER OF T.M. THOMAS MANAGER, MOTHER PROVINCIAL BETHANY SISTERS' PROVINCIALATE P.O NALANCHIRA, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM 695 001 BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT.

GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014 3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM - 695 101 4.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM 695 541 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 31934 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 15.7.13 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 30.07.13 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE GOVT. DTD. 20.09.15 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.31934 of 2015 - N ====================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P3 representation filed before the 1st respondent. The representation is filed on 20.09.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the representation filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/ 20 /10 /2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.