Mujeeb Rahman v. The Sub Inspector Of Police, Erattupetta Police Station
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/28TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31980 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- MUJEEB RAHMAN, S/O.ABDUL RAZAK, AGED 30 YEARS, PEEDIKATHAZHATH, KUDAYATHOOR P.O., KUDAYATHUR VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT, (OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-36-5056).
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERATTUPETTA POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 001.
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 001.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 001.
4. THE DIRECTOR, MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 31980 of 2015 (V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE MAHAZAR DATED 25/08/2015 PREPARED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 15/09/2015 IN WP(C).NO.27843/2015.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
================== W.P.(C).No. 31980 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner's vehicle KL 36-5056 has been seized alleging violation under the provisions of Kerala Protection of River bank and regulation of removal of sand Act, 2001. The petitioner made a request before the 2nd respondent to take sample of sand and forward the same for analysis by the 4th respondent. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take sample of the seized sand and forward the same to the 4th respondent. This shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment. Thereafter, the 4th respondent shall send its report within a period of one week. On receipt of report from the 4th respondent, the 2nd respondent shall conclude the entire proceedings within a further period of two weeks based on the report.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE