High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32055/2015disposed of

Ashokan K v. The Additional Tahsildar

2015-10-20Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/28TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32055 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- ASHOKAN. K., SON OF M.K. KUTTIKRISHNAN NAIR, ANUGRAHA, KOOVAPPADY P.O., PIN-683 544, KOOVAPPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS. SRI.V.M.KURIAN, SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN, SRI.K.T.THOMAS.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUNADU, PERUMBAVOOR-683 542.

2. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUNADU, PERUMBAVOOR-683 542.

3. SANTHA, W/O.P.S. NARAYANAN, PENATTU HOUSE, KOOVAPPADY P.O., PIN-683 544, KOOVAPPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.K. SHERIN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 32055 of 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1.

TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 12/02/2014 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2.

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 05/07/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE OFFICIAL RESPONDENTS. EXT.P3.

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 30/07/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE OFFICIAL RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 32055 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner approached the revenue officials by Ext.P3 to correct the entry in re-survey in respect of the landed property comprised in Survey No. 35/4A-1 and A2 (Block No.9, Re-Sy. No.260) of Koovappady Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Ernakulam. 2.

According to the petitioner this land is exclusively belongs to him. However registration of sale deed is objected on the ground that the land is shown as porampoke land, which is in fact a mistake. The petitioner grievance has been highlighted as per Ext.P3. In the light of above the first respondent is directed to take necessary action in the matter within two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment. It is open for the first respondent to insist the petitioner to file an application for the demarcation of the property claimed by the petitioner based on the title deeds.

The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE