← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36354/2009closed

K.D.Rappai v. Thrissur Corporation And Others

2015-07-22Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36354 of 2009 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K.D. RAPPAI, S/O. DEVASSI, KONNIKARA HOUSE, COMPANY PADI, OLLUR. P.O., THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THRISSUR CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR.

2. HEALTH OFFICER, THRISSUR CORPORATION, ZONAL OFFICE, OLLUR, THRISSUR.

3. TONY ANOKKARAN, K.J. DEVASSY SAW MILL, OLLUR. P.O., THRISSUR.

4. K.J. DEVASSI. K.J. DEVASSI SAW MILL, KONNIKARA HOUSE, OLLUR. P.O., THRISSUR.

R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN, SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR.

SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS SRI.V.N.HARIDAS.

R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.DHANIL.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 36354 of 2009 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17/08/2009 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 13/10/2009 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 COPY OF THE SUBMITTED A COMPLAINT DATED 07/12/2009 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P4 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 07/12/2009 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 36354 of 2009 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the purpose, for which the writ petition is filed, has been served as the party respondent has stopped the operation of the saw mill unit.

Therefore, the writ petition is closed with a direction to the respondent corporation to ensure that no saw mill unit shall be operated by the party respondent without any valid licence from the respondent corporation. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-