The Manager, K.R.P.M. Higher Secondary School, Seethathode v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/29TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32184 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------ THE MANAGER K.R.P.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL SEETHATHODE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:
----------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 001.
3. SRI. R.HARIKRISHNAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER K.R.P.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL SEETHATHODE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 32184 of 2015 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- EXT.P1 :
COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 01.06.2015.
EXT.P2 :
COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER OF THE MANAGER DATED 01.06.2015.
EXT.P3 :
COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER 2014-2015 DATED 15.07.2014.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL -------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.32184 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of October, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-approval of Ext.P1 appointment order dated 01.06.2015 by the 2nd respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 within a reasonable time. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P1 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the 2nd respondent will consider in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge.
sp/28/10/15