Devaki v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32211 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- DEVAKI W/O. KUNHIRAMAN, KAROTH VALAPPIL HOUSE, RAMAPURAM PAZHAYANGADI P.O., KANNUR.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KANNUR-670 001.

BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32211 of 2015 (B) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE REQUEST DTD.1.9.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P2 :

COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 32211 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 03rd day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines her relief to an early consideration of Ext. P2 application for replacement of the vehicle. The Government Pleader points out that clearance certificate in respect of the earlier vehicle was issued long back. Reliance is placed on Usman v. Regional Transport Authority [2015 (4) KLT 25] and the judgment in W.A. No. 2175/2015. All these are matters to be dealt with by the respondent while considering Ext. P2 application.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext. P2 application with notice to the petitioner in the light of the law laid down by this Court. The same shall be done within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS