High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32252/2015disposed of

The Manager v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-21Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/29TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32252 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS:

--------------------

1. THE MANAGER, AGED 65 YEARS K R P M HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, SEETHATHODE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT

2. P. T SANTHI HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SANSKRIT) K R P M HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, SEETHATHODE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA - 689 101.

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32252 of 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- EXT. P1 - COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF SMT G. VASANTHAKUMARY AMMA DATED 01/04/2013 AND APPROVAL THEREON.

EXT. P2 - COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 02/06/2014.

EXT. P3 - COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 24/03/2015.

EXT. P4 - COPY OF THE APPAAL PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE MANAGER DATED 09/04/2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL -------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.32252 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of October, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 appeal dated 09.04.2015 filed before the 2nd respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 within a reasonable time. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 appeal as expeditiously as possible and after hearing the petitioner, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the 2nd respondent will consider in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

sp-21/10/15