High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32337/2015disposed of

Shihabudheen v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram

2015-10-29Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/7TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32337 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- SHIHABUDHEEN S/O.SAITHALAVI, THARAYIL HOUSE, THANALUR TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM PIN 676 505.

BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32337 of 2015 (N) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1PHOTOCOPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT VIDE NO. P.ST 10/834/1996 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT P2PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 1.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 32337 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify a period not exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE