High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36228/2010dismissed as infructuous

Velayudhan Asari And Another v. State Of Kerala And Others

2015-02-023 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/13TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 36228 of 2010 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS :

------------------------

1. VELAYUDHAN ASARI,CHAZHIYOTTIL, ATTASSERY, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD.

2. MUHAMMED, CHANDANKUZHIYAN HOUSE, ATTASSERY, CHERUPULASSERY, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C RESPONDENTS :

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTRATE, CIVIL STATION PALAKKAD-678 001.

2. ASST.ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD-679 503.

3. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 001

4. SAROJINI,PULLIKKANCHERY HOUSE, ATTASSERY, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD-679 503.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB R2 AND R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B R4 BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VS

WP(C).No. 36228 of 2010 (C) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------------------------- EXT.P1 :

TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION IN D3/2010/45741/09 EXT.P2 :

TRUE COPY OF REJOINDER DATED 13.10.2010 EXT.P3 :

TRUE COPY OF ORDER IN D3/2010/45741/09 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL ------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE VS

ANIL.K.NARENDRAN, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.36228 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, even before communication of the interim order passed by this Court dated 3.12.2010, electric line has already been energised. Therefore the learned Counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to raise the contentions raised in this writ petition in appropriate proceedings, if found necessary.

In such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the petitioner's right to raise all these contentions in appropriate proceedings.

Sd/- ANIL.K.NARENDRAN JUDGE vs