T.A.Ashraf Kunju Assan v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/5TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32557 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- T.A.ASHRAF KUNJU ASSAN, AGED 43 YEARS S/O. ABOOBECKER KUNJU ASSAN, PRINCIPAL, LAJNATHUL MUHAMMADIYA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001 BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:
------------------------ 1.
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2.
THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATIONA CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM 686 001.
3.
THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 689 121.
4.
THE MANAGER, LAJNATHUL MUHAMMADIYA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, LAJNATH WARD, ALAPPUZHA 688 001.
5.
SRI. A. MOHAMMED SABIR SAHIB, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (PHYSICS) LAJNATHUL MUHAMMADIYA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, LAJNATH WARD, ALAPPUZHA 688 001.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 32557 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 01.06.2015 P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2/4708/2015/RDDE/HSE DATED 8.7.2015 OF THE RDD, ERNAKULAM P3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.23564/2015-U DATED 5.8.2015 P4 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2/7673/RDD/HSE/KTM/15 DATED 22.09.2015 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT P5 :
TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2013(4) KLT 257 DATED 14.08.2013 P6 :
TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT ALONG WITH STAY PETITION DATED 03.10.2015 BY THE MANAGER //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 32557 of 2015 (T) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of October, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P6 revision dated 03.10.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.
2.
Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law. The reversion of the petitioner shall stand stayed till orders are passed in the revision.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 27/10/15