J.V.Deepa Valsalam v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/5TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32608 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- J.V.DEEPA VALSALAM, AGED 34 YEARS D/O. M.J. VALSALAM, HSA (MALAYALAM), MGM HIGHER SCHOOL, POOZHANAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014 3.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014 4.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 673 101 5.

THE MANAGER, MGM HIGH SCHOOL, POOZHANAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 125.

R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32608 of 2015 (A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1.6.2015 P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 1.7.2015 P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION OF THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 7.9.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 32608 of 2015 (A) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P3 revision dated 07.09.2013 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 27/10/15