Usvathunnisa K. v. A.E.O, Wandoor

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/5TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32613 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- USVATHUNNISA K. AGED 31 YEARS JUNIOR LANGUAGE TEACHER IN ARABIC, A.L.P. SCHOOL - AMBALAKADAVU, P.O. KALIKAVU MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM 679 328.

2.

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014 3.

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 4.

THE MANAGER, A.L.P. SCHOOL - AMBALAKADAVU, P.O. KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 525.

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32613 of 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITOINER DATED 1.6.2011 P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT PETITION FILED BY THE PETITONER, MANAGER AND P.SUBAIDA P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN THE WRIT APPEAL NO.1124/2013 P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF RELINQUISHMENT FILED BY SMT. P.SUBAIDA DATED 16.5.2014 P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT DATED 10.7.2014 P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE D.P.I. DATED 22.5.2015 P7 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BY THE MANAGER DATED 1.7.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 32613 of 2015 (B) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P7 revision dated 01.07.2015 has not been considered till date by the 3rd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Manager and petitioner, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 3rd respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 27/10/15