Mary Varghese v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/6TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32638 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- MARY VARGHESE, AGED 60 YEARS W/O.VARGHESE KOMBASSERIL HOUSE KALUMALA P.O., MAVELIKKARA ALAPPUZHA.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):

------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001. R BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.32638 OF 2015 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PEITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 15.9.2015 ALONG WITH PROPOSED TIMING ON THE ROUTE KAYAMKULAM - THIRUVALLA, WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 4/Q 9413.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.32638 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner confines her relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj./28.10.15