← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32927/2014disposed of

Rennin Rooks Alias Sunil v. Elakunnapuzha Grama Panchayat

2015-09-10Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/19TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32927 of 2014 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ RENNIN ROOKS ALIAS SUNIL, AGED 40, S/O. LATE GANGADHARAN, PARUTHIYEZHATH HOUSE, ELAKUNNAPUZHA P.O., VYPPIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.C.P.SAJI SMT.P.DEEPA MOHAN RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. ELAKUNNAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYAT ELAMKUNNAPUZHA P.O., VYPPIN ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 503 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. SECRETARY, ELAKUNNAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA P.O., VYPPIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 503.

3. P.M.CHINNAN, PUTHENPURAKKAL VEEDU, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA P.O., VYPPIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 503.

R3 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32927 of 2014 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 - TRUE COPY OF PETITION DT. 10.3.14 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2 - TRUE COPY OFTHE ORDER NO. A7/2852/11 DT. 28.5.14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. 2852/A7 DT. 28.5.14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. 2852/A7 DT. 28.5.14 DATED ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, MALIPURAM.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R3(a) - TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 04.06.2014 OF 3RD RESPONDENT /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 32927 OF 2014 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The allegation is that the 'thodu' is being encroached upon by the third respondent. The matter is engaging the attention of the second respondent in this regard.

2.

I direct the second respondent to take the proceedings to a logical end. The same shall be done within a period of one month. Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the third respondent shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd