High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32932/2014disposed of

Linith C. v. The Secretary

2015-03-13Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/22ND PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 32932 of 2014 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- LIJITH C., S/O. CHITHANANDAN, LAL NIVAS, MAYYANADU P.O., KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM - 691 001.

2. B.UNNIKRISHNAN, 4/296, THEKKECHANGAD, MUKKOM, MAYYANAD P.O., KOLLAM - 691 303.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH R2 BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 32932 of 2014 (N) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 19.6.14. P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 07.8.14.

P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 21742/14 DT. 29.8.14. P4 - A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DT. 10.10.14 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. P5 - A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 20.11.14.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

==================================== W.P.(C)No.32932 of 2014 ==================================== Dated this the 13th day of March, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is aggrieved with the timing conference scheduled as against the second respondent. The second respondent's timings were settled as per Ext.P1 dated 19.6.2014. Subsequently, it is stated that, aggrieved by the said settlement of timings, request for revision was made on 7.8.2014 and this Court was approached seeking consideration of the same. This Court passed Ext.P3, where the same was directed to be considered. Petitioner's contention is that, his objection, also may be considered. In such circumstances, the petitioner's objection shall be considered, when considering the third respondent's timings, scheduled as per Ext.P3 judgment. Writ petition is disposed off.

K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.

sl.