High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32778/2015disposed of

Sanilkumar v. Secretary, Rta, Kannur

2015-11-02Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32778 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------- SANIL KUMAR, S/O.KRISHNAN THARAPURATH HOUSE, VADAKKEPOIYILOOR, THALASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):

------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR - 670 001. R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32778 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-13 K 5052. P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 19.10.2015 P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.26955/2015 DATED 11.9.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.32778 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P3 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify a period not exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/2.11.2015