High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32813/2015dismissed as infructuous

Pramod Kumar S.N. v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-21Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32813 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- PRAMOD KUMAR S.N., TREASURER, KERALA PANCHAYAT EMPLOYEES FEDERATION STATE COMMITTEE JOINT COUNCIL BUILDING THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS.SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.P.P.BIJU SRI.K.S.RAJESH SRI.ANISH PAUL RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 680 933

2. KERALA STATE DELIMITATION COMMISSION REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CWC BUILDING, LMS COMPOUND, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 680 933

3. KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LMS JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 680 933 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. BY SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMMN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32813 of 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPYOF THE NOTIFICATION NO 35526/EM 3/2014/LSGD DT. 26-08-2015 EXHIBITP2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SUGGESSIONS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE ELECTION COMMISSION EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OFTHE NOTIFICATION G.O.P 289/2015/LSGD DT 15-09-2015 EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUECOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 16-09-2015 EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER ISSUED UNDER RTI ACT DT 3-10-2015 RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE.

ncd

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.32813 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ext.P3 notification impugned in this writ petition already stands quashed by judgment dated 10.8.2015 in W.P.(C) No.17248/2015. The same is echoed in the judgment dated 8.10.2015 in W.P.(C) No.28512/2015.

2. The petitioner is free to rake up the issue as and when a notification is issued for the next election. The prayers sought in the present writ petition have obviously become infructuous.

The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/22.12.15