High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32821/2015disposed of

P.Narayana Kurup v. The Secretary, Rta, Vatakara

2015-11-03Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32821 of 2015 (C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- P.NARAYANA KURUP S/O.GOPALAN NAMBIAR, PAVAYI, AVIDANALLUR P.O., KOOTALIDA KOZHIKODE.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA - 673 101.

BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32821 of 2015 (C) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.P.ST.18/444/2001 EXT.P-2: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT DATED 26.10.2015 VEHICLE NO.KL 56/D 5517 ON THE ROUTE BALUSSERY - MEPPAYUR.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 32821 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify the period within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

DCS