← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/32824/2015disposed of

Hussain.P.K v. The Secretary

2015-10-29Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/7TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 32824 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER:

-------------------------- HUSSAIN.P.K PARAKKANDIYIL HOUSE KITTIKATTUR P.O.

KOZHKODE BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER VATAKARA - 673 101 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 32824 of 2015 (C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT :- EXT. P1:

COPY OF THE TIMING PROCEEDINGS DATED 29.10.2009 EXT. P2:

COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 6.8.2015 ON THE ROUTE KUTTIKATTOORKOZHIKODE-KANNUR AS LSOS WITH STAGE CARRAIGE KL 11/AE EXT. P3:

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.08.2015 IN W.P.(C). NO. 26182/2015 EXT. P4:

COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RTO VATAKARA DATED 8.10.2015 EXT. P5:

COPY OF THE TIME HEARING NOTICE DATED 8.10.2015 EXT. P6:

COPY OF THE MEMO ISSUED BY THE RTO VATAKARA DATED 15.10.2015 EXT. P7:

COPY OF THE D3 NOTIFICATION WITHITS NO. D3/875/STA/2005 DATED 8.11.2011 EXT. P8:

COPY OF D3 NOTIFICATION WITHITS NO. D3/875/STA/2015 DATED 25.06.2015 EXT. P9:

COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 20.10.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT:- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 32824 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

All that the petitioner prays is for a consideration of Ext. P9 request during the settlement of timings in the conference slated on 31.10.2015.

2.

Whether D3 circular requires to be implemented or not shall be considered in the light of the judgment dated 19.10.2015 in W.P.(C). No. 31840/2015. 3.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext. P9 request also during the settlement of timings in the meeting slated on 31.10.2015. Needless to say that Ext. P4 request already put in by the petitioner shall also be adverted to in the exercise.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS