High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33154/2014disposed of

Sanjithkumar v. The Managing Director, Ksrtc

2015-01-12Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/22ND POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 33154 of 2014 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- SANJITH KUMAR, AGED 53, S/O.A.POULOSE, 1ST GRADE CONDUCTOR, OTHER DUTY STATION MASTER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, NEDUMANGAD - LATHERGINI COMPOUND HOUSE, ARYANAD, PIN-698 842, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.BALA PRASANNAN RESPONDENTS:

-------------------------

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, NEDUMANGAD 698 842.

BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33154 of 2014 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 30/10/2014 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION EXHIBIT P2 :- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRENSETATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 3/11/2014 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION EXHIBIT P3 :- TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET DTD 6/11/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION EXHIBIT P4 :- TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM ISSUED BY THE KERALA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION HAVING NO TR-I.037674/14 DTD 7/10/2014 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION EXHIBIT P5 :- TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 14.11.2014 ALONG WITH ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 33154 OF 2014 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The duty of the petitioner has been shifted from Other Duty Station Master to Line Duty Conductor.

Disciplinary proceedings are pending and the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 explanation to Ext.P4 charge memo. All that the petitioner now seeks is for expeditious termination of the disciplinary proceedings initiated.

I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P5 explanation submitted to Ext.P4 memorandum of charges. The needful shall be done with due notice to the petitioner within a period of two months.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd