← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33018/2015dismissed

Thampi Subramanian v. The State Election Commission

2015-10-293 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/7TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33018 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- THAMPI SUBRAMANIAN AGED 33 YEARS S/O. SUBRAMANIAN 18/1172 ESI ROAD PALLURUTHY KOCHIN - 682 006 BY ADV. SRI.A.G.BASIL RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY CORPORATION OFFICER BUILDINGS LMS JUNCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033 2.

DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM CIVIL STATION KAKKANAD - 682 030 3.

SUB-COLLECTOR FORT KOCHI (RETURNING OFFICER ) FORT KOCHI - 1 4.

THAMPI, GURUVILASAM 20/567 PIPELINE ROAD PALLURUTHY - 682 006 R1 BY SRI. MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E. COMMISSION R2 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER BOBY JOHN PULIKKAPARAMBIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33018 of 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF CANDIDATES TO BE INCLUDED IN THE BALLOT PAPER PROVISIONAL PUBLISHED BY THE RETURNING OFFICER, SUB-COLLECTOR, FORT KOCHI, DATED 17.10.2015 P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 33018 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The ballot papers have already been printed and postal ballots have already been despatched. It is inequitable to alter the serial No. of the candidates in the list. Moreover all the candidates have not been impleaded in the writ petition. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed following Joice George v. The Election Commissioner of India [2014 (2) KLT 230].

The writ petition fails and is dismissed.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS