Gopinath Das K.R v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/8TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33070 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------ GOPINATH DAS K.R, NOW WORKING AS HSST POLITICAL SCIENCE, C.K.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KORUTHODU, VIA MUNDAKKAYAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

RESIDING AT KANAKKALAYIL, NEDUMANNI P.O NEDUMKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM 686 542 BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON THOMAS RESPONDENTS:

-------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, GENARAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2. DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001.

3. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM 686001.

4. MANAGER, CKM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KORUTHODU, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686532.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33070 of 2015 (G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER OF THE PETITIONER AS HSST POLITICAL SCIENCE JUNIOR.

P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER OF THE PETITIONER AS HSST POLITICAL SCIENCE JUNIOR.

P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 12.6.2015.

P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 12.6.2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE.

kp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 33070 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P4 representation dated 12.09.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 30/10/15