High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33106/2015disposed of

Mrs. Bhagyalekha v. District Collector

2015-12-01Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33106 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ MRS. BHAGYALEKHA, AGED 29 YEARS, D/O.CHANDRAN SATHGAMAYA, KOCHERIPADI, N.PARAVUR P.O., ERNAKULAM - 683 513.

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 030.

2. THAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, N.PARAVUR, PIN: 683 513.

3. VILLAGE OFFICER, N.PARUR, PIN: 683 513.

4. THE ZONAL MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, KERALA ZONE, KALOOR TOWERS, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017.

5. BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, N.PARAVUR - 683 513.

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER R4 & R5 BY ADV. SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 33106 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26/8/2015 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.4 AND 5 DATED 15/10/2015.

P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 12/8/2013.

P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 24/9/2013.

P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER BEARING NO.48/2013 ISSUED BY THE STATE OF KERALA.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

W.P.(C).No.33106 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 1st day of December, 2015 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, had approached this Court through the present writ petition aggrieved by the steps taken by the respondent bank for recovery of defaulted loan amounts. It is submitted by the learned Standing counsel for the respondent bank, relying on the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 4 and 5, that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner had approached the 5th respondent with a proposal for one time settlement, which was accepted by the respondents, and the petitioner has since paid the amount as agreed upon namely, Rs.2,35,000/-.It is submitted that what remains to be paid by the petitioner is an amount of approximately Rs.

3000/- to respondents 1 to 3 by way of collection charges. Taking note of the said submission of counsel for the respondent bank, I close this writ petition by recording the factum of settlement of the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5 and directing the petitioner to pay the amount of approximately Rs.3000/- (to be quantified and intimated to the petitioner by the 2nd respondent within one week from today) to the respondents within two weeks from the date of receipt of the intimation from the 2nd respondent.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns/01.12.15