The Corporate Manager v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/8TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33153 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- THE CORPORATE MANAGER, ST.MARY MAGDALENE CONVENT EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, ADUPUTTY HILLS, KANIPPAYYUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 517 BY ADVS.V.A.MUHAMMED M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

-------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.

3.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 503 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BKA/-

WP(C).No. 33153 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'(S) EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MANAGEMENT DATED 10.05.76 ALONG WITH AMENDMENT.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 25.04.1989 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DATED 13.11.2002.

EXT.P4 COPY OF THE STAFF LIST AS ON 04.06.2012.

EXT.P5 COPY OF THE STAFF LIST AS ON 01.06.2006.

EXT.P6 COPY OF THE G.O.(RT.)NO.3354/2012/G.EDN. DATED 16.07.2012 OF THE GOVERNMENT.

EXT.P7 COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.10.2014 EXT.P8 COPY OF THE REPLY OF THE PETITIONER DATED 26.03.2015. EXT.P9 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.14896/2015-J DATED 21.05.2015.

EXT.P10 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.08.2015. EXT.P11 COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 30.08.2015.

RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE bka/-

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 33153 of 2015 (T) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P11 revision dated 30.08.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 30/10/15