Mehrunnisa v. Circle Inspector Of Police,Attingal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33206 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
----------------------- MEHRUNNISA, W/O.AMEER HAMZA, AGED 50 YEARS, ANAS MANZIL, POOVANKAL, MUTTAPPALAM.P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 145 BY ADVS.SRI.M.ZIYAD SRI.T.A.PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIRCLE OFFICE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 001.
2. HAMID,S/O.MOHAMMED NOOH, FAIZAL MANZIL, POOVANKAL, MUTTAPPALAM.P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 145 R1 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
WP(C).No. 33206 of 2015 (A) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:
THE TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT TO SELL DATED 28.07.2015 ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
EXT.P2:
THE TRUE COPY OF THE ATTACHMENT ORDER DATED 16.10.2015 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, ATTINGAL.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.33206 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to the 2nd respondent in view of the judgment being passed today. 2.
Petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging police harassment. Petitioner's case is that her husband entered into an agreement with the 2nd respondent on 28/07/2015 for selling a house. It is stated that, at the instance of the 2nd respondent, petitioner was summoned on 29/10/2015 and an undertaking was taken that she would pay Rs.22.5 lakhs to the 2nd respondent. 3.
The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that after recording the statement of the parties, it was revealed that there is a civil dispute between the parties. Hence the matter has been closed.
4.
In that view of the matter, we are of the view that present is not a case of any police harassment. Parties are at liberty to get their disputes settled in a competent civil court. With the above observation, this writ petition is dismissed. (sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) True Copy PA to Judge jsr/03/11/2015