Sheeja C.P. v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33230 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
--------------------- SHEEJA C.P. AGED 38 YEARS NEEDLE WORK TEACHER, KUTHUPARAMBA HIGH SCHOOL, P.O. KUTHUPARAMBA KANNUR BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENTS:
---------------------------- 1.
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 95 001 2.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
3.
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY 670 101. 4.
MANAGER KUTHUPARAMBA HIGH SCHOOL, P.O. KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR 670 643.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 33230 of 2015 (C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 14.8.2007 P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2013 (1) KHC 660 (SC) P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2013(4) KHC SN 35 PAGE 49 P4:
TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.EM(4) 78191/11/DPI DATED 29.12.2011 P5:
TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.9.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 33230 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P5 representation dated 18.09.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.
2.
Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 2/11/15