Sudheer v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33275 of 2015 (H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- SUDHEER S, KILIYANVILAKOM, VAKKOM P.O., VAKKOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (RURAL) ATINGAL-695 101.

BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33275 of 2015 (H) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE AGENDA. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 15.9.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 5.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 33275 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 02nd day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P3 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS