Thrivikraman Thampi v. Sub Collector, Alappuzha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2015/1ST JYAISHTA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.33605 of 2014 (A) --------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- ------------------------
1. THRIVIKRAMAN THAMPI, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O DHANANJAYAN, NIKARTHIL HOUSE, KAYIPURAM, MUHAMMA.
2. ANILA KUMARI, W/O THRIVIKRAMAN THAMPI, NIKARTHIL HOUSE, KAYIPURAM, MUHAMMA.
BY ADVS. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SENIOR ADVOCATE) SRI.S.SUJIN.
RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------
1. SUB COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA.
2. MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL, ALAPPUZHA.
3. MAINTENANCE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ALAPPUZHA.
4. DHANANJAYAN P.V, PALAYKKAL VELI, CHARAMANGALAM, MUHAMMA, ALLAPPUZHA
5. SARALA DEVI, PALAYAKKAL VELI, CHARAMANGALAM, MUHAMMA, ALLAPPUZHA. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN. R4&5 BY ADVS. SRI.BIJU ABRAHAM SRI.R.RATHEESH.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.33605 of 2014 (A) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26-03-2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF HTE ORDER DATED 01-06-2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12-11-2014 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 24-02-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT SUB COLLECTOR.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------------- NIL.
Vku/- [ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.33605 of 2014-A ------------------------------------- Dated this the 22 nd day of May, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are husband and wife, who challenge Exhibit P2 order of the Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 [for brevity "the Act"]. The provisions of the Act were invoked by the respondents st petitioner, the son of the 4 and 5, seeking maintenance from the 1 respondents 4 and 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners only seek for instalments to pay the amounts directed in Exhibit P2. In the above circumstance, the petitioners shall pay the amounts directed in Exhibit P2 in six equal monthly instalments, th of every starting from 15.06.2015 and continued on the 15 succeeding month.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/- [ true copy ]