Muhammed Nassim v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33391 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MUHAMMED NASSIM AGED 56 YEARS VALIYAKUDILIL HOUSE NEERKUNNAM, VANDANAM,ALAPPUZHA BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA-688 001.

R BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 33391 of 2015 ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT ALONG WITH AND PROPOSED TIMING DATED 30.9.2015 ON THE ROUTE ARTHINKAL-AROOR TEMPLE, WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 16/D 2345 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 33391 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P1 request filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit. 2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1 request and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks